From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 122168 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2016 07:21:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 122154 invoked by uid 89); 18 Aug 2016 07:21:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Joel, stopgap, stop-gap, Hx-languages-length:574 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 07:21:37 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B47011705B; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 03:21:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id iefXNbl0G6-j; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 03:21:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D8EE117050; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 03:21:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E138E428F6; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 09:21:33 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 07:21:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: David Edelsohn Cc: Andreas Schwab , "gdb@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: GDB Python extension on AIX Message-ID: <20160818072133.GB3037@adacore.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SW-Source: 2016-08/txt/msg00041.txt.bz2 > I think the ball is in GDB's court. > > If GDB is going to intervene in these macros for some systems and > configuratino, I request a method to disable this for AIX. Seems like a reasonable request to me, at least as a stop-gap measure. If there is a way to do things more correctly, perhaps we could look at that as a second step. Note that it is strange that I don't see the error you are seeing. But perhaps it has to do with the fact that we use a version of Python which we built and installed at a non-standard location? -- Joel