Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>, "gdb@sourceware.org" <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: C++ conversion status update
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:16:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160413141648.GI31406@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <570E51CB.6010304@redhat.com>

> OK.  We can just add an entry to lynxos to GDB_AC_BUILD_WITH_CXX
> to make it default to C, still.  Like this, against
> the version in the users/palves/cxx-conversion branch:
> 
> diff --git i/gdb/build-with-cxx.m4 w/gdb/build-with-cxx.m4
> index aa3661f..e42719e 100644
> --- i/gdb/build-with-cxx.m4
> +++ w/gdb/build-with-cxx.m4
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ AC_DEFUN([GDB_AC_BUILD_WITH_CXX],
>      *-*nto* | \
>      *-*bsd* | \
>      xtensa*-*-linux* | \
> +    *-*-lynxos* | \
>      null)
>        enable_build_with_cxx=no ;;
>      *)
> 
> That'll give you until all the other hosts are confirmed-converted,
> at least.

We could do that indeed; or, IIRC, there is a configure option
to force the use of C instead of C++. I don't mind requiring
the user to force it; it's a good reminder (and ties in nicely
with another comment below).

> > If we do, perhaps it's time to change the major version number
> > to 8.0?
> > 
> 
> Or maybe defer that until we actually declare C mode unsupported.
> I myself hope to do that before the next release, but ...  :-)

:-). I know it sounds self-serving, but I think we should be giving
users a one-release grace period. Make C++ the default, but with
C support for those who can't build with C++. That way, they can
still build, but they are clearly on notice about the impending
change. Then, as soon as the release branch is cut, we can flip
the switch. That way, I don't think you'll have to keep the compat
mode for much longer than you were planning to.

> (Another thought that crossed my mind before is to switch the
> numbering scheme to follow something like gcc's.  That is, make
> the minor number be the major number going forward, as
> the minor number actually counts new-feature releases, while
> the major number is arbitrary.)

Definitely a possibility. Let's discuss that separately at some point!

-- 
Joel


  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-13 14:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-24 13:07 Pedro Alves
2015-12-14 14:40 ` Yao Qi
2015-12-14 19:09   ` Pedro Alves
2015-12-15 11:39     ` Jose E. Marchesi
2015-12-15 20:03       ` Simon Marchi
2015-12-16  0:19         ` Pedro Alves
2015-12-16  0:21           ` Pedro Alves
2015-12-16  1:19             ` Simon Marchi
2015-12-16 20:11               ` Pedro Alves
2015-12-16 20:15       ` Pedro Alves
2015-12-16 20:30         ` Simon Marchi
2015-12-16 22:10           ` Pedro Alves
2015-12-16 22:59             ` Pedro Alves
2016-01-19 19:00     ` John Baldwin
2016-01-20 11:10       ` Pedro Alves
2016-01-20 23:33         ` John Baldwin
2016-01-21 11:38           ` Pedro Alves
2016-04-16  0:21           ` Pedro Alves
2016-04-18 16:51             ` Pedro Alves
2016-04-19 19:26               ` John Baldwin
2016-04-19 20:36                 ` Pedro Alves
2016-04-19 21:40                   ` John Baldwin
2016-04-19 22:20                     ` Pedro Alves
2016-04-13  0:25     ` Pedro Alves
2016-04-13 11:07       ` Yao Qi
2016-04-13 14:13         ` Pedro Alves
2016-04-13 14:31           ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2016-04-13 12:41       ` Joel Brobecker
2016-04-13 14:04         ` Pedro Alves
2016-04-13 14:16           ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2016-04-13 14:27             ` Luis Machado
2016-04-13 14:35             ` Marc Khouzam
2016-04-13 14:59               ` Joel Brobecker
2016-04-13 14:40             ` Pedro Alves
2016-04-18 17:29               ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160413141648.GI31406@adacore.com \
    --to=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox