From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 124409 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2016 19:53:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 124394 invoked by uid 89); 8 Jan 2016 19:53:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: smtp.gentoo.org Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (HELO smtp.gentoo.org) (140.211.166.183) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 19:53:21 +0000 Received: from vapier.lan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 17912340901; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 19:53:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 19:53:00 -0000 From: Mike Frysinger To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, tromey@redhat.com Subject: Re: using automake to generate Makefile.in Message-ID: <20160108195318.GN25548@vapier.lan> Mail-Followup-To: Jan Kratochvil , gdb@sourceware.org, tromey@redhat.com References: <20160107214249.GF25548@vapier.lan> <20160108191103.GA20883@host1.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XPfPv5HFi+O4rHSw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160108191103.GA20883@host1.jankratochvil.net> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-01/txt/msg00007.txt.bz2 --XPfPv5HFi+O4rHSw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 557 On 08 Jan 2016 20:11, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Thu, 07 Jan 2016 22:42:49 +0100, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > is there a reason we don't use automake in the tree to manage > > Makefile.in ? >=20 > IIRC Tom Tromey (also a coauthor of automake) wanted to do that or at lea= st he > said it would be good to do that but just nobody has never done so. do we have a requirement that it be done treewide ? or would people be fine with me doing (starting) in sim/ ? doing it in just sim/ would allow for some limited testing w/out breaking lots of people ... -mike --XPfPv5HFi+O4rHSw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-length: 819 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWkBOuAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBvmUP+gJUixYUX+HE+uTtCFwI4upL UkBhoyowsrh6xpQs4Ek71qLpCdQdyAdevZnft1XT/XosBKtH3/TKAvkZF3TAoU23 wXtmYGvWnFctWYQTr9sxrZOZGhsn+oujDRryycXh+DZxHPcE6zUzpdpvjPBnxOWy GqX7UfvQdkyAIA2K0mO8N2+KQrA0yHcL00tI9V1PpHoiozOEIznPetHkOGlTmarJ amWKToTwb6ac4Raw/KuNb+ZYZlTmpdMcdcKbxP0GfFV1PbVkQMHwOyfGk4TK5dw+ rAyU546jLGJKH79JxrDWoLPHshz3nLGLvqtI1L+Yljl5vWgoqHELPxavFU2LTp6O gzMaSGRC+OCKsToac9KHY0yiYWumAuX6NCfOmeF4A3HfS0KMZh8bEaHA/D5PIjme zrYSN/r86tmOccTnN2lJrRdmc56OSjsGiScWkN7d05z8PsD7PshbsPK15+2C4Kvx aKfRiA0ceCrehlsTl1j4OOaE8r0omgC/898IoKR6bVBzht9bEMooSbOBL+nni9Y2 oqqv6QEDQ6C0ugweL9bY7EW4GSBXPWf3thQDwa/2YhtivGqavSUQA5V8ZBFar7nW CfiWDN9FKOSY+Ypm8zOO3Mm7JySlxWk/fCk4pn0K5B+ISdA3m4gM7niLh9RlMlJk T04+dQ5DO0vqJpHmLvJ9 =M0Jk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XPfPv5HFi+O4rHSw--