From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 60975 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 14:38:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 60959 invoked by uid 89); 24 Nov 2015 14:38:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: phoenix.clifford.at Received: from phoenix.clifford.at (HELO phoenix.clifford.at) (88.198.7.52) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:38:13 +0000 Received: by phoenix.clifford.at (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4F2123380C84; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 15:38:11 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:38:00 -0000 From: Clifford Wolf To: Tristan Gingold Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Commands for a minimal GDB stub? Message-ID: <20151124143811.GA10563@clifford.at> References: <20151124133817.GA10033@clifford.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg00039.txt.bz2 On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 02:51:49PM +0100, Tristan Gingold wrote: > I think the documentation is slightly incorrect. For an almost minimal > gdb stub, I have also implemented: > ?, z, Z, qSupported, qC, qSymbol::, P, k, H > z, Z, H, k, qSupported returned $#00. > > You shouldn’t be very far from having a communication. thanks. I've now added 'S05' as response to '?' and now I get to the point where gdb actually queries the register file using the 'g' command. So I think I'm now where the actual work starts.. ;) again, thanks a lot for your help! kind regards, - clifford