From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-44394-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 116788 invoked by alias); 29 May 2015 11:42:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 116778 invoked by uid 89); 29 May 2015 11:42:47 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail.bfw-online.de
Received: from mail.bfw-online.de (HELO mail.bfw-online.de) (62.245.186.164) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 29 May 2015 11:42:46 +0000
Received: from weller by mail.bfw-online.de with local (Exim 4.85)	(envelope-from <weller@bfw-online.de>)	id 1YyIgV-00046S-A2; Fri, 29 May 2015 13:42:43 +0200
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 11:42:00 -0000
From: Weller <weller@bfw-online.de>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: find_overload_match for constructor
Message-ID: <20150529114243.GA13783@bfw-online.de>
References: <20150508092906.GA23005@bfw-online.de> <20150529112931.GA1850@bfw-online.de> <20150529113524.GA15937@host1.jankratochvil.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150529113524.GA15937@host1.jankratochvil.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00038.txt.bz2

Okay thanks for the quick answer. I might try that hack and see if it
works good enough for my problem. If not I'll have to include a few
extra functions in the library to allow non-constructor calls for the
class.

Lennart

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 01:35:24PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Fri, 29 May 2015 13:29:31 +0200, Weller wrote:
> > Anyone got any ideas how this could be achieved?
> 
> Officially it is not supported.
> 
> I remember I achieved that one by calling malloc() and passing the address as
> the first parameter to a constructor (its 'this') but that is a hack.
> 
> It should be supported by the 'compile code' integration with GCC but its C++
> part is not yet ready.
> 
> 
> Jan