From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 78697 invoked by alias); 30 Mar 2015 20:54:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 78682 invoked by uid 89); 30 Mar 2015 20:54:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 20:54:42 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97339D37D6; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:54:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id xwtqMYMM4UDh; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:54:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7155DD37D0; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:54:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 45E1440EAD; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 13:54:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 20:54:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Joel Sherrill Cc: "gdb@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: x86_64-elf gdb Message-ID: <20150330205442.GG12083@adacore.com> References: <55171834.40509@oarcorp.com> <20150330163952.GE12083@adacore.com> <5B7C7627-4AA7-4276-B2EB-A9E5C170CBAA@oarcorp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5B7C7627-4AA7-4276-B2EB-A9E5C170CBAA@oarcorp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2015-03/txt/msg00117.txt.bz2 > It built for me. But I don't have any way to test it. > Is that enough to submit a patch for the elf stanza addition? That seems odd to me. What would be the advantage of pushing that patch if it's a configuration that you can't test? -- Joel