From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24206 invoked by alias); 29 Dec 2014 02:43:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 24190 invoked by uid 89); 29 Dec 2014 02:43:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 02:43:13 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 230D41161E6; Sun, 28 Dec 2014 21:43:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id zTxLmUtFxKBs; Sun, 28 Dec 2014 21:43:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D6E81161D8; Sun, 28 Dec 2014 21:43:10 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BE9724100E; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 06:43:05 +0400 (RET) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 02:43:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Sergio Durigan Junior Cc: Hannes Domani , "gdb@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: building gdb with TUI support on Windows Message-ID: <20141229024305.GF2098@adacore.com> References: <83lhltkwo4.fsf@gnu.org> <1007829038.1780704.1419691186453.JavaMail.yahoo@jws11139.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <87wq5bk4bq.fsf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87wq5bk4bq.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg00055.txt.bz2 > >> AFAIR, there was a suggestion some time ago to remove TUI support > >> altogether. > > > > So the developers don't use it at all themselves? > > I use TUI a lot, and I know other developers do as well. I don't > remember the proposal to remove TUI, and recently we have been receiving > some nice patches to fix issues on it. I might have mentioned the idea a few years back, but it was very quickly dismissed ;-). -- Joel