From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32591 invoked by alias); 26 Dec 2014 12:58:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 32575 invoked by uid 89); 26 Dec 2014 12:58:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 12:58:36 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sBQCwYuO028131 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 26 Dec 2014 07:58:34 -0500 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-47.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.47]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sBQCwUNK021938 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 26 Dec 2014 07:58:33 -0500 Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 12:58:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Nithi G Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Fw: gdb@gnu.org Message-ID: <20141226125829.GA8696@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <1419596308.17404.YahooMailBasic@web121905.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1419596308.17404.YahooMailBasic@web121905.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg00041.txt.bz2 On Fri, 26 Dec 2014 13:18:28 +0100, Nithi G wrote: > Kindly update the status on the same.This is quite urgent and it will be > appreciated if provide the solution immediately What is specifically the problem? BTW the messages like warning: Ignoring non-absolute filename: Missing separate debuginfo for libmpcontainer.so Try: yum --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo='*-debug*' install /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/43/d10324cf3cd0a20af7c6af9f18e45689fe2ee3 are specific to Fedora/RHEL and not suitable for this upstream mailing list. The message Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install glibc-2.12-1.132.el6.x86_64 libaio-0.3.107-10.el6.x86_64 libgcc-4.4.7-4.el6.x86_64 libstdc++-4.4.7-4.el6.x86_64 numactl-2.0.7-6.el6.x86_64 says clearly what you should do, why haven't you done it yet? And it is also specific to Fedora/RHEL and not suitable for this upstream mailing list. The messages like Reading symbols from /apprate1/rateadm/lib/rhel62_x86.x/librcc_xbalance.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. show what your libraries do not have debug info, you should either recompile them with -g or turn off their stripping or to supply their separate debug info for example as file: /apprate1/rateadm/lib/rhel62_x86.x/librcc_xbalance.so.debug But despite these installation problems finally you get the correct prompt: #0 0x000000310920f5db in raise () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (gdb) so just type "backtrace" there - or what do you want else? Just due to the missing debug info function parameters, local variables etc. will not be shown. But sometimes they are not needed for fixing a crash. Jan