From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-43911-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 14489 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2014 20:16:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 14469 invoked by uid 89); 14 Nov 2014 20:16:09 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 20:16:09 +0000
Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sAEKG3ZU001212	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL);	Fri, 14 Nov 2014 15:16:04 -0500
Received: from greed.delorie.com (ovpn-113-33.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.33])	by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sAEKG2Vt013463	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);	Fri, 14 Nov 2014 15:16:03 -0500
Received: from greed.delorie.com (greed.delorie.com [127.0.0.1])	by greed.delorie.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sAEKG1Rg022673;	Fri, 14 Nov 2014 15:16:01 -0500
Received: (from dj@localhost)	by greed.delorie.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id sAEKG0c0022671;	Fri, 14 Nov 2014 15:16:00 -0500
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 20:16:00 -0000
Message-Id: <201411142016.sAEKG0c0022671@greed.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
CC: gdb@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <87r3x6nknn.fsf@igel.home> (message from Andreas Schwab on Fri,	14 Nov 2014 11:25:48 +0100)
Subject: Re: why is sim_addr_range_hit_p tagged inline?
References: <201411132030.sADKUbhj008048@greed.delorie.com> <87r3x6nknn.fsf@igel.home>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg00021.txt.bz2


> Unless HAVE_INLINE is defined.

Ah, ick.  I noticed this because I had a report from a Mac user that
they were getting "multiply defined symbols" for that function.