From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2208 invoked by alias); 14 Aug 2014 13:12:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 2186 invoked by uid 89); 14 Aug 2014 13:12:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 13:12:18 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s7EDC7PF015704 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 14 Aug 2014 09:12:08 -0400 Received: from blade.nx (ovpn-116-116.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.116]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s7EDC7AW012367; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 09:12:07 -0400 Received: by blade.nx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6C7992640EA; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 14:12:06 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 13:12:00 -0000 From: Gary Benson To: Mike Frysinger Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, Andreas Arnez Subject: Re: ChangeLogs in commit messages Message-ID: <20140814131206.GA12746@blade.nx> References: <20140814083231.GA6283@blade.nx> <6036430.RnprRWgZmF@vapier> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6036430.RnprRWgZmF@vapier> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-08/txt/msg00021.txt.bz2 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thu 14 Aug 2014 09:32:31 Gary Benson wrote: > > What are people's preferences here? My preference is #1, but I > > could live with #3. If we come to some kind of concensus on this > > I'll update the wiki to reflect this. > > (4) -- none of the above. the ChangeLog files contain the same > data, so the commit messages should contain useful details. > i.e. the same content you used when you posted to the mailing list. Do you mean #4 (changelog entries with no path/author-date) or are you proposing new option #5 (no changelog in the commit message at all)? #5 would suit me too. Cheers, Gary -- http://gbenson.net/