From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11213 invoked by alias); 4 Jun 2014 10:28:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 11196 invoked by uid 89); 4 Jun 2014 10:28:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: popelka.ms.mff.cuni.cz Received: from popelka.ms.mff.cuni.cz (HELO popelka.ms.mff.cuni.cz) (195.113.20.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 10:28:36 +0000 Received: from domone.kolej.mff.cuni.cz (popelka.ms.mff.cuni.cz [195.113.20.131]) by popelka.ms.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABB475591C; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 12:28:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: by domone.kolej.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6167C5F81D; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 12:28:32 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 10:28:00 -0000 From: =?utf-8?B?T25kxZllaiBCw61sa2E=?= To: Siddhesh Poyarekar Cc: Samuel Bronson , libc-alpha@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: patchwork.sourceware.org is live! Message-ID: <20140604102831.GA30607@domone.podge> References: <20140523211338.GK12497@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com> <5382E7F2.4020506@suse.com> <5382EF22.4060705@suse.com> <5382F50E.7040702@suse.com> <20140526102052.GA18682@domone> <87d2ewdo60.fsf@naesten.mooo.com> <20140530030029.GN12497@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140530030029.GN12497@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg00010.txt.bz2 On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 08:30:29AM +0530, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 09:56:55PM -0400, Samuel Bronson wrote: > > Are there any objections to the new state? > > None so far. I have added it to patchwork now. I have not yet made > 'Accepted' an 'Action Required' state because that will clutter the > view; I'll do it when I get explicit blessings from more maintainers. > > > > That should be set automatically. I use a following script to detect > > > commited patches. > > > > If there are no objections, I guess the script will need to be changed > > to put patches in the "Committed" state instead of the "Accepted" state? > > > > However, really I'd prefer if it could give some indication as to > > *which* commit(s) the patch was committed as, and it doesn't look like > > this is viable with the current approach, since you seem to just test if > > each patch can be applied backwards to HEAD. > > > > Oh, but now I notice that that *particular* script is glibc-only anyway, > > so maybe I don't really care that much ... > Its pretty general, you can use it for any project that uses git. A more important part is running automated checks with it.