From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23573 invoked by alias); 30 May 2014 15:00:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 23552 invoked by uid 89); 30 May 2014 15:00:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 30 May 2014 15:00:00 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C0E4116287; Fri, 30 May 2014 10:59:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id qa8dTyqCCTVt; Fri, 30 May 2014 10:59:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B320116281; Fri, 30 May 2014 10:59:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3DE314001D; Fri, 30 May 2014 07:59:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 15:10:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" Cc: Simon Marchi , Samuel Bronson , gdb@sourceware.org, overseers@sourceware.org Subject: Re: git clone through http Message-ID: <20140530145958.GH4265@adacore.com> References: <53876894.5020103@ericsson.com> <87ha48dp55.fsf@naesten.mooo.com> <538897D1.1070602@ericsson.com> <20140530145045.GD13644@elastic.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140530145045.GD13644@elastic.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00095.txt.bz2 > > > 2. Somehow set up a "smart" web-based git server. [...] > > > Choice 2 is clearly more complicated and more httpd-specific, but also > > > more efficient in most cases. > > We'll consider it, though an even easier thing we could do is stop > promoting the http:// git URL. If we do, it would be interesting to know where that is. I double-checked GDB's website, and it only references the "git" protocol. -- Joel