From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11884 invoked by alias); 30 May 2014 14:48:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 11595 invoked by uid 89); 30 May 2014 14:48:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 30 May 2014 14:48:23 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5438D116285; Fri, 30 May 2014 10:48:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id LWeZqijzSIhW; Fri, 30 May 2014 10:48:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CC8711627D; Fri, 30 May 2014 10:48:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 120C34001D; Fri, 30 May 2014 07:48:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 14:50:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Simon Marchi Cc: Samuel Bronson , gdb@sourceware.org, overseers@sourceware.org Subject: Re: git clone through http Message-ID: <20140530144821.GF4265@adacore.com> References: <53876894.5020103@ericsson.com> <87ha48dp55.fsf@naesten.mooo.com> <538897D1.1070602@ericsson.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <538897D1.1070602@ericsson.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00093.txt.bz2 > I suppose this is something that the overseers would have to look at ? Is there an advantage of adding "http" support, since already have access via the "git" protocol? The latter is what we document on the GDB web pages. -- Joel