From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5923 invoked by alias); 23 May 2014 12:50:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 5893 invoked by uid 89); 23 May 2014 12:50:47 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 May 2014 12:50:45 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s4NCoeSj022377 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 23 May 2014 08:50:40 -0400 Received: from spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com (dhcp193-134.pnq.redhat.com [10.65.193.134]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s4NCoXJj005367 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 23 May 2014 08:50:37 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 12:50:00 -0000 From: Siddhesh Poyarekar To: Pedro Alves Cc: "Frank Ch. Eigler" , Siddhesh Poyarekar , "Joseph S. Myers" , GNU C Library , carlos@redhat.com, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Actually setting up patchwork on sourceware Message-ID: <20140523125151.GF14500@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com> References: <20140402055454.GB23931@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com> <20140512171726.GB6983@redhat.com> <20140513060412.GB21360@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com> <5371DF7C.7060408@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vsHhinrhaqUzFcVS" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5371DF7C.7060408@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22.1-rc1 (2013-10-16) X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00049.txt.bz2 --vsHhinrhaqUzFcVS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 1236 On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:01:48AM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 05/13/14 07:04, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 01:17:26PM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > >> Hi - > >> > >>> [...] Frank, did you get a chance to look at it? I have > >>> documented[1] the process I had followed to do the patchwork setup > >>> on my host. [...] > >> > >> Sorry, I was under the impression that y'all were still choosing > >> between patchwork and other alternatives. (Maybe "y'all" included gdb > >> folks, cc:'d.) We'd love not to have to have N new but similar > >> widgets running on sourceware. > >=20 > > I had set up a test instance for gdb folks too and Gary had requested > > that I also migrate the gdb instance from my server to sourceware > > since it would take a while for gdb to decide on their final choice, > > so I'm not sure if it's worth our while to wait for that to happen. >=20 > Yes, please migrate gdb's too. At least myself, I'm finding the > gdb instance useful. As long as it exists, might as well have it set > up alongside glibc's. That's great. Given that 10 days have past since your response, is it safe to assume that nobody in the gdb community is opposed to using patchwork? Siddhesh --vsHhinrhaqUzFcVS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-length: 473 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTf0RnAAoJEHnEPfvxzyGH1zEH/3Ofqh74vtaH3NmrbP97cEfA PWcKv8lskAJe3srewJ2WqTobmEAWbDIF6me67/s+mLRP8Sl+Kd4wLMJiGSWTxN0t Sas1X2edigz0cxDcSeL/o3r0w1Wl3ms9Ny3DNfI10ElozOfjQUUV5iWIwvctMaOC BpZoaeDBl4Fa+2MFAmluj2RdOumlFjqP++PUmdABGWJyxfcfzsehqX9iuQznUQqs qJA5ysNvZ2oYQjoOT0oO35TE46kopo5gPZT8IiOutoD+AXY7kuXBVGxHomSjrjso saNbrAUyR3L8T68SVlQr6b/b7OTfY4SevF4Oq6x9PRxc3cLten/XbGfjEnhRmcg= =2ena -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vsHhinrhaqUzFcVS--