From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7493 invoked by alias); 12 May 2014 17:17:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 7471 invoked by uid 89); 12 May 2014 17:17:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 May 2014 17:17:32 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s4CHHRWR003725 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 12 May 2014 13:17:28 -0400 Received: from fche.csb (vpn-54-210.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.54.210]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s4CHHRLM003380; Mon, 12 May 2014 13:17:27 -0400 Received: by fche.csb (Postfix, from userid 2569) id 1DC4658182; Mon, 12 May 2014 13:17:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 17:17:00 -0000 From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" To: Siddhesh Poyarekar Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" , GNU C Library , carlos@redhat.com, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Actually setting up patchwork on sourceware Message-ID: <20140512171726.GB6983@redhat.com> References: <20140402055454.GB23931@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00016.txt.bz2 Hi - > [...] Frank, did you get a chance to look at it? I have > documented[1] the process I had followed to do the patchwork setup > on my host. [...] Sorry, I was under the impression that y'all were still choosing between patchwork and other alternatives. (Maybe "y'all" included gdb folks, cc:'d.) We'd love not to have to have N new but similar widgets running on sourceware. - FChE