From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7686 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2014 15:51:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 7675 invoked by uid 89); 22 Apr 2014 15:51:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 15:51:35 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B67D116124; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:51:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id P8qfoNcztgAm; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:51:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2334D116122; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:51:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C5221E070B; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:51:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 18:37:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Eric Christopher Cc: Gary Benson , Stan Shebs , "gdb@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: Patchwork patch tracking system Message-ID: <20140422155132.GB6383@adacore.com> References: <20140402100842.GA956@blade.nx> <533F3713.40700@earthlink.net> <20140417135040.GA891@blade.nx> <20140422130652.GG5790@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2014-04/txt/msg00075.txt.bz2 > FWIW we (some of the google folk) looked at geritt for LLVM and > discarded in favor of phabricator. It seemed to solve a lot of the > problems that we had and allowed communication to and from the mailing > lists for patches which was key for us as we have a similar review > style to gcc/gdb/binutils. We didn't want to remove the ability for > people to send patches to the mailing lists, but yet get a better > review mechanism for large patches/queuing/etc. Thanks for the suggestion! I have to say, from the outside, phabricator looks like a pretty interesting option. -- Joel