From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29783 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2014 20:11:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 29766 invoked by uid 89); 17 Apr 2014 20:11:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 20:11:13 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88E0111612E; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 16:11:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 5qTeAuxEceuv; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 16:11:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C63116125; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 16:11:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BAE43E07F7; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 13:11:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 21:32:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: quick update on the GDB 7.7.1 and GDB 7.8 releases Message-ID: <20140417201118.GK12882@adacore.com> References: <20140417181903.GH12882@adacore.com> <8338hbiv87.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8338hbiv87.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2014-04/txt/msg00054.txt.bz2 > > We are about 2.5 weeks away from our tentative 7.7.1 release. > > AFAIK, there are no blocking issues for that release, so if you > > have anything that should be going in 7.7.1, please hurry! :) > > I'd like to have the "PC register not available" bug solved in the > MinGW build, but I need to hear the final OK for that. I agree that it would be nice to have that fix, and we should try to have it in as soon as possible to widen the testing field as much as we can before branching. I don't think there is any hold up, though, as my understanding is that both Pedro and I gave the OK for the GDB side of the fix. The GDBserver side, if relevant, can be handled independently. -- Joel