Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
To: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
Cc: Edjunior Barbosa Machado <emachado@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	GDB <gdb@sourceware.org>, Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>,
	Peter Bergner <bergner@vnet.ibm.com>,
	Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho <tuliom@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Vendor branches on sourceware.org's binutils-gdb repo
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2014 19:18:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140406191404.GC7558@drone.musicnaut.iki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3vbunyoza.fsf@redhat.com>

Hi,

On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 03:02:49AM -0300, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> Hm, just a comment, but nothing major or blocker.  I understand the need
> for vendor branches, but I also think that we should make more use of
> git's distributed model.  For example, why can't Company X (I am not
> criticizing anyone particularly, really) create and maintain its own git
> repository, with all the necessary branches there?  Wouldn't that be
> better than (a) "polluting" sourceware's repository and (b) putting an
> extra pressure on sourceware's infra?

I think it's very useful for users to have all vendor branches
in a single repository. At least with glibc this has helped me a lot
(as a user) when identifying and cherry-picking needed fixes to
my own systems.

A.


  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-06 19:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-05 20:12 Edjunior Barbosa Machado
2014-04-06  6:02 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2014-04-06 19:18   ` Aaro Koskinen [this message]
2014-04-07  3:51     ` Joel Brobecker
2014-04-07 14:27       ` Michael Matz
2014-04-07 14:47         ` Joel Brobecker
2014-04-07 15:41           ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2014-04-07 14:52         ` Mark Kettenis
2014-04-07 15:06           ` Andreas Schwab
2014-04-07 15:16             ` Matthew Fortune
2014-04-07 15:39             ` Mark Kettenis
2014-04-07 15:43               ` Andreas Schwab
2014-04-07 15:44               ` Michael Matz
2014-04-07 15:41           ` Michael Matz
2014-04-07 15:46             ` Joel Brobecker
2014-04-07 15:48             ` Andreas Schwab
2014-04-09  1:49           ` Matt Rice
2014-04-09 12:46             ` Joel Brobecker
2014-04-08 23:17 ` Mike Frysinger
2014-04-09 17:58 ` Stan Shebs
2014-04-09 18:41   ` Doug Evans
2016-06-27 19:15 ` Mike Frysinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140406191404.GC7558@drone.musicnaut.iki.fi \
    --to=aaro.koskinen@iki.fi \
    --cc=bergner@vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=emachado@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    --cc=sergiodj@redhat.com \
    --cc=tuliom@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox