From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21555 invoked by alias); 13 May 2013 14:52:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 21530 invoked by uid 89); 13 May 2013 14:52:38 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 May 2013 14:52:38 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4DEqXYp030103 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 13 May 2013 10:52:33 -0400 Received: from zalov.cz (vpn-60-18.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.60.18]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4DEqVtL030499 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 13 May 2013 10:52:32 -0400 Received: from zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zalov.cz (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4DEqTif000593; Mon, 13 May 2013 16:52:30 +0200 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by zalov.cz (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id r4DEqQ1n000591; Mon, 13 May 2013 16:52:26 +0200 Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 14:52:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: David Taylor Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sourceware.org, binutils@zalov.cz Subject: Re: stabs changes for 64 bit targets Message-ID: <20130513145224.GY1377@tucnak.redhat.com> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <18975.1368456346@usendtaylorx2l> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18975.1368456346@usendtaylorx2l> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2013-05/txt/msg00054.txt.bz2 On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:45:46AM -0400, David Taylor wrote: > There are problems when using current STABS debug format for 64 bit > targets. Why are you considering extending STABS at this point? STABS support might very well be dropped altogether from GCC 4.9 or the next release, people just should use DWARF[234] everywhere. Jakub