From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31431 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2013 18:07:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 31318 invoked by uid 89); 20 Mar 2013 18:07:31 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-8.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 18:07:28 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r2KI7QcQ020366 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:07:27 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-42.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.42]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r2KI7NFc001763 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:07:25 -0400 Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 18:07:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Strange backtrace from GDB 7.5.91 Message-ID: <20130320180722.GA32375@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <83ppyuynhd.fsf@gnu.org> <20130320175740.GA31878@host2.jankratochvil.net> <83k3p2ymli.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83k3p2ymli.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00052.txt.bz2 On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 19:04:09 +0100, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > It needs a fix in GDB: > > Bug 15223 - reversed order of inlined function parameters > > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15223 > > Thanks. > > Any chance of fixing this before 7.6 is released? I do not think so, it is not a regression and I do not even think such change is safe so late in the release process. Jan