From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22062 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2013 19:40:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 22031 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Feb 2013 19:40:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:40:17 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r1IJeHs3018360 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:40:17 -0500 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-18.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.18]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r1IJe9OQ004833 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:40:16 -0500 Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:40:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Tom Tromey Cc: GDB Development Subject: Re: RFC - changes to the test suite Message-ID: <20130218194009.GA24746@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <87fw0ta4jk.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87fw0ta4jk.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00069.txt.bz2 On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:57:19 +0100, Tom Tromey wrote: > So, the first question is -- does anybody care strongly about where the > files end up? And, if you do care, why do you care? > > I can pretty easily make it so that the files end up in the usual place > when not running in "parallel" mode. I don't think this is as good, but > I could do it if there is an outcry. If it is easy enough I find it useful. The reasons are the same why I like in-source-tree-builds. I have everything on the same place, no need to -complete source directory and -complete different output directory and still dealing with two directories while editing sources and checking their output. This is useful only when running single file by "runtest x/y.exp". In some batch parallel mode I sure do not mind where the output files end up. Thanks, Jan