From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14357 invoked by alias); 14 Feb 2013 13:44:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 14235 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Feb 2013 13:44:25 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:44:08 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r1EDi7hM023244 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:44:07 -0500 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-18.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.18]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r1EDi3Iw019288 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:44:06 -0500 Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:44:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Michael Haupt Cc: "gdb@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: debugging custom array types Message-ID: <20130214134402.GA19093@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20130211170221.GA16645@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20130213175858.GA7244@host2.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00054.txt.bz2 On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 14:37:56 +0100, Michael Haupt wrote: > Am 13.02.2013 um 18:58 schrieb Jan Kratochvil : > > That DW_TAG_array_type/DW_TAG_subrange_type with dynamic DW_AT_upper_bound > > should be supported but not as a directly embedded part of struct. > > if I'm not totally mistaken (which I would not preclude), Appendix D.2.1 of > the DWARF standard document suggests otherwise. Yes, the example from Appendix D.2.1 is not supported by archer-jankratochvil-vla. Jan