From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16474 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2013 03:42:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 16459 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Feb 2013 03:42:17 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 03:42:10 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 509E12E405; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 22:42:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id xC9O0-A1Ye1i; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 22:42:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B3432E16D; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 22:42:08 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D517EC38F3; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 19:42:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 03:42:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Yao Qi Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: reminder: tentative date for branching is this coming monday... Message-ID: <20130201034206.GX3532@adacore.com> References: <20130131010551.GB3600@adacore.com> <510A4C81.1080507@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <510A4C81.1080507@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2 > I would like the "=tsv-modified" MI notification patch > (http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2013-01/msg00714.html) goes > in, because we've already have "=tsv-created" and "=tsv-deleted" and > good to bundle these three in a release, which is good to MI > frontend. OK. Can you make sure it gets reviewed reasonably quickly, so as not to delay the branching unreasonably? Thank you, -- Joel