From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8639 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2013 05:54:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 8630 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Jan 2013 05:54:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 05:54:17 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7177D2E278; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 00:54:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id UuOApyBY2tcQ; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 00:54:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A167B2E274; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 00:54:15 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EA0D9C162D; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 09:54:06 +0400 (RET) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 05:54:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: John Gilmore Cc: Martin Runge , gdb@sourceware.org, Martin Runge Subject: Re: RFC: include mod time and size in DWARF file name table Message-ID: <20130113055406.GX3567@adacore.com> References: <201301130519.r0D5JQJJ016059@new.toad.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201301130519.r0D5JQJJ016059@new.toad.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00048.txt.bz2 > Yes. The big problem with this approach is that you can never compile > the same source code files to produce the same binary code files. [snip] I can also confirm that he have had many reports about this as well. -- Joel