From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23190 invoked by alias); 5 Jan 2013 14:52:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 23164 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Jan 2013 14:52:26 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 14:52:21 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D80902E3A7; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 09:52:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id gvdbChYx6jqC; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 09:52:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 471402E12B; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 09:52:19 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9A432C1626; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 18:52:13 +0400 (RET) Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 14:52:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: David Edelsohn Cc: Tom Tromey , David Taylor , binutils@sourceware.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb Message-ID: <20130105145213.GK3567@adacore.com> References: <12972.1357230104__33958.3243280233$1357230256$gmane$org@usendtaylorx2l> <87hamy42ua.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20130104041232.GA3567@adacore.com> <20130105075300.GG3567@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00025.txt.bz2 > It does not look like the changes were merged into the FSF tree. This > also does not support some of the more recent AIX features added to > GCC. Tristan is usually pretty good at sending these sorts of patches. I will ask him on Monday if some might be missing. He's been extremely busy lately, so it's a possibility. It would also be useful to explain how you are basing your evaluation, and in particular say what does not work for you. > I also infer that Adacore continues to use the AIX assembler, not GNU as. We also use GNU as. -- Joel