From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28283 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2012 13:48:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 28270 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Dec 2012 13:48:04 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (83.163.83.176) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 13:47:59 +0000 Received: from glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id qBDDlrod002170; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:47:53 +0100 (CET) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id qBDDlp31015431; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:47:51 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 13:48:00 -0000 Message-Id: <201212131347.qBDDlp31015431@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: brobecker@adacore.com CC: gdb@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20121213124345.GJ3663@adacore.com> (message from Joel Brobecker on Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:43:45 +0400) Subject: Re: old GDB snapshots... References: <20121213124345.GJ3663@adacore.com> Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00048.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:43:45 +0400 > From: Joel Brobecker > > Hello all, > > Jan was asking about the snaphots we provide on sourceware's > FTP server. And indeed, we have many! > > We produce weekly snaphots, and daily patches, I believe. > As far as I can tell, the scripts are supposed to delete old > snapshots, only keeping a certain number of every kind (numbers > depend on the type of file - for instance we keep more daily > diffs than we keep weekly tarballs). > > I believe that the scripts do not delete old snapshots after > we increment the version number, so old snapshots have been > accumulating: > - HEAD snapshots: 1.2GB with ~230 files; > - branch snapshots: 3.6GB with ~630 files. > (we have snapshots dating back to 6.3) > > I am going to do some cleanup, but how far back do we want > to keep? What's the rationale for having snapshots at all when we have anoncvs access?