From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8285 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2012 03:03:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 8277 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Dec 2012 03:03:52 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 03:03:45 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 013121C79C5; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 22:03:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id fejo+dYhIXXF; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 22:03:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 922B41C79BE; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 22:03:44 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4F413C0E21; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 07:03:31 +0400 (RET) Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 03:03:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Andreas Arnez Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Unexpected DW_AT_type for Ada strings on s390x? Message-ID: <20121207030331.GB18566@adacore.com> References: <87fw3mhxbb.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20121204121036.GK18566@adacore.com> <87r4n4hmzh.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20121206045209.GW18566@adacore.com> <877govguyh.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <877govguyh.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00033.txt.bz2 > > I'm just waiting for you to confirm that the patch fixes the FAIL, and > > I will commit the whole patch. > > OK, confirmed. The patch fixes the FAIL on s390x. Great, thanks for confirming. The patch is now in. See: http://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-12/msg00127.html -- Joel