From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20495 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2012 17:51:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 20481 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Nov 2012 17:51:32 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:51:28 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B74352E092; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 12:51:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id lyRYa5nBIpVS; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 12:51:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A192E054; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 12:51:27 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9691CC87DF; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 09:51:25 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:51:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gnu@toad.com, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Time to expand "Program received signal" ? Message-ID: <20121115175125.GE3806@adacore.com> References: <50A13A4E.3020000@redhat.com> <20121113162530.GX4847@adacore.com> <201211131640.qADGeKhs021376@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <50A281BC.9030802@redhat.com> <201211132240.qADMeB2N032392@new.toad.com> <50A371C6.3080307@redhat.com> <201211141954.qAEJsQ2N026469@new.toad.com> <50A4C5AA.70304@redhat.com> <83mwyiu7j6.fsf@gnu.org> <50A52493.70807@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50A52493.70807@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00037.txt.bz2 FWIW, it feels like we're making a big fuss out of one detail. I don't think that calling the main thread of a non-threaded program "thread" is that big of a deal. Certainly not worth complexifying GDB over it, IMO, however trivial people might think it is (and I am not sure that it is, in fact, trivial). -- Joel