From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29027 invoked by alias); 5 May 2012 06:53:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 29012 invoked by uid 22791); 5 May 2012 06:53:14 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 May 2012 06:52:58 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q456qvm7032758 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 5 May 2012 02:52:57 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-17.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.17]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q456qsxN008348 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 5 May 2012 02:52:56 -0400 Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 06:53:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Sergio Durigan Junior Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Modify stap-probe.h to identify SystemTap probes Message-ID: <20120505065253.GA8272@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120504152129.GA7418@redhat.com> <20120505060312.GA7019@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120505062315.GA7458@host2.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00017.txt.bz2 On Sat, 05 May 2012 08:41:49 +0200, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > On Saturday, May 05 2012, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > If the current probe.h interface is insufficient then it should be extended. > > I agree, but that's not the case. `probe.h' is sufficient, but it is > not its responsibility to tell if a probe foo is a SystemTap probe. Why cannot probe XYZ serve the task a SystemTap probe does? The name "SystemTap" makes the probe somehow unique no other probe kind can be placed at the same address providing the same information? Regards, Jan