From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24409 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2012 16:21:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 24391 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Apr 2012 16:21:31 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:21:19 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FFD41C6486; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:21:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id R2AnztNs5y7Z; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:21:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4277D1C647D; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:21:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4E851145616; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:20:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:21:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pawe?? Sikora Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GDB 7.4.1 release on Wed? Message-ID: <20120424162059.GC29339@adacore.com> References: <20120423235301.GG25623@adacore.com> <2550250.y7pXfgxabX@localhost> <20120424154417.GH25623@adacore.com> <19937143.aDPZNFCO6Z@pawels> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <19937143.aDPZNFCO6Z@pawels> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00201.txt.bz2 > current master (57a68b7) is faster (~1 minute for the testing step) > and eats less memory (~500M -> ~1G during step) than 7.4-head but > the 7.3-head is the fastest one (2..3 seconds! for testing step). Hmmm, in that case, we're going to need more time to figure out what's going on, and a lot of us are really quite busy working on other things. So I am afraid that we'll be out of luck for 7.4.1. We can port the patch I mentioned in my previous email to make things a little better, but otherwise we'll have to wait for 7.5 for a proper fix. -- Joel