From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8598 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2012 23:08:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 8590 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jan 2012 23:08:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SARE_SUB_OBFU_Z,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (HELO smtp.gentoo.org) (140.211.166.183) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 23:08:15 +0000 Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19BD91B4033; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 23:08:10 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: xz-compressed release tarballs? Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 23:08:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, jim@meyering.net References: <87mx9a1ag4.fsf@rho.meyering.net> <201201271341.41758.vapier@gentoo.org> <831uqkz1co.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <831uqkz1co.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2768258.31ShTm7lKi"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201201281809.17343.vapier@gentoo.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00106.txt.bz2 --nextPart2768258.31ShTm7lKi Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 653 On Saturday 28 January 2012 03:18:47 Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I see nothing ridiculous in a request to cater to a situation of your > fellow developer of Free Software, and don't understand how can you > ridicule such a request. sorry, but i really can't find anything worth replying to here. being a fr= ee=20 software developer doesn't mean being able to force people to adhere to wha= t=20 works on their personal legacy systems where the user refuses to upgrade th= e=20 software. that is unreasonable. i've got plenty of old systems, but i don't try and force everyone else to = try=20 and support them at the detriment of future progress. -mike --nextPart2768258.31ShTm7lKi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-length: 836 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJPJIAdAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBieMQANnNHoRj+E7wBxsVcCl3Fiyu KtayOHGTqkI9MiiilKEzCVpmSavni/Uerdx7S5ZmutmHCeab+phFHINU0Ehqz+FL FoIZmaHaLhLHRx+bf//FZJj0+Y/cSf1CGtUEXsBMWBJ0ASU9s68mZzVjIfmjqHA+ U3GIrjIAymJ331r2XHRo7K0Ycr09row29NsobxnFcMeSOGJVbR2oqz94uxa/9ZtY P+VLsNwHp5dIsayoVVLYK7YUkBA2uQiPw50EI2JDptEpFShtVOitlBOT09boqt0q mwdA1O78hPH/vTVroJEdQbFVGFotFHTDEjomxqPYTfEJDSpdQlZ8+Qjm4vqR94Z7 tr1Md09hGjSL8ARRJx4hQzbfrutb6LRXezOwc9mebnnU9/+u9knmxtsJLgb/bUho xT+7iKXfuSNQX+PtTnlTF83rMu1uggRY9ZLFmWzB+Ybnu5ooGA9Hc7luRDr+ZDMi gyhcacy/Z7Jtx5SPTQEheowbsiS1J7cFK+7sQpci6Zwl3yPsn9m2LFHIeEqAWghr z6C8Zc4W7OsBBs+7gYvW8AKLv2e8pBj97A8m0ce5Mys9k5qY9hezpZHD6V32LxJZ MFCJxd5MvjYzjz+B6e4E3JQMXQ6U1ofoKjUx5ZXrfX1pdhwHAM3in9+MyOjaK+ou kM1Fhx7HZqjkW9c8xMls =Sesg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2768258.31ShTm7lKi--