From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6282 invoked by alias); 1 Dec 2011 16:55:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 6219 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Dec 2011 16:55:00 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 16:54:47 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E572BB5E3 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 11:54:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 45XAca8WKe1i for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 11:54:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED1432BB5E1 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 11:54:46 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5CE04145615; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 08:54:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 16:55:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: ambiguous linespec decision point Message-ID: <20111201165444.GC2781@adacore.com> References: <20111201130435.GA3708@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111201130435.GA3708@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2 > For what it's worth, I've been using the branch for the past few weeks > while I've been working on the inline function breakpoint stuff, and > I've not noticed anything awful. I think it's very useful to get feedback from real life use - thank you! -- Joel