From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20353 invoked by alias); 1 Dec 2011 13:04:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 20343 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Dec 2011 13:04:58 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from gbenson.demon.co.uk (HELO gbenson.demon.co.uk) (80.177.220.214) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 13:04:39 +0000 Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 13:04:00 -0000 From: Gary Benson To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: ambiguous linespec decision point Message-ID: <20111201130435.GA3708@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sourceware.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00000.txt.bz2 Tom Tromey wrote: > It is time to decide whether the ambiguous linespec patch should go > in for 7.4 or be delayed until 7.5. Since I am ready to be done > with this patch, I don't think I can be really objective about it, > so I am looking for input on this topic. > > At this point the patch is regression free, according to the test > suite, and Joel has fixed the remaining problems shown by the > AdaCore test suite. > > The main risk is just that the patch is quite large and so there may > be regressions lurking that the test suite has not revealed. For what it's worth, I've been using the branch for the past few weeks while I've been working on the inline function breakpoint stuff, and I've not noticed anything awful. Cheers, Gary -- http://gbenson.net/