From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-40260-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 21333 invoked by alias); 30 Nov 2011 23:31:50 -0000
Received: (qmail 21324 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Nov 2011 23:31:50 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 23:31:37 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])	by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41C932BB12A;	Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:31:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1])	by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)	with LMTP id nhNePZYplQ3Q; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:31:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])	by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170582BB103;	Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:31:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)	id 21678145615; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:31:20 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 23:31:00 -0000
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>, GDB Development <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: ambiguous linespec decision point
Message-ID: <20111130233120.GP26480@adacore.com>
References: <m38vmxiljz.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <m3mxbdjj8s.fsf@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m3mxbdjj8s.fsf@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00138.txt.bz2

> I know my opinion does not count that much, but I think it is OK to
> check it in since you both spent quite some time hunting and solving
> bugs on this.  Moreover, after the branching we would have two weeks
> IIRC to find some regression and fix it.

I think what I will do if the patch goes in is create the branch
right after, and then wait a week before creating the first pre-
release. And then plan for the official releasee 2 weeks later.
That gives us a week to find potential bugs before we ask for wider
testing...

-- 
Joel