Re: GIT and CVS

Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-14T15:47:14Z

On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 17:38:37 +0200, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> I really don't think this is an argument for one version control system
> over another. They all seem to make it far too easy to commit patches
> where you've accidentally failed to add new files to version control.

The point was to ensure the same version control system is used both locally
and server-side. Which requires dVCS. Which excludes for example SVN (and
also CVS).

I had a fear CVS may be considered as a valid VCS.

Thanks,
Jan