From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-39872-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 13851 invoked by alias); 30 Sep 2011 18:50:58 -0000
Received: (qmail 13840 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Sep 2011 18:50:57 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:50:37 +0000
Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p8UIoZlw026521	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Fri, 30 Sep 2011 14:50:35 -0400
Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-16.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.16])	by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p8UIoW5T008512	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);	Fri, 30 Sep 2011 14:50:34 -0400
Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p8UIoVsa007534;	Fri, 30 Sep 2011 20:50:31 +0200
Received: (from jkratoch@localhost)	by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p8UIoUKj007533;	Fri, 30 Sep 2011 20:50:30 +0200
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:50:00 -0000
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Joost van der Sluis <joost@cnoc.nl>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>, gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Handling of c++ function members
Message-ID: <20110930185030.GA7047@host1.jankratochvil.net>
References: <1317055596.23338.12.camel@feddie.cnoc.lan> <CAN9gPaE0K+z-8H5NyHmHg2KcYz2QEAHOy=eXC28bva0-zD4xhg@mail.gmail.com> <1317070857.17681.11.camel@feddie.cnoc.lan> <1317135598.27942.29.camel@feddie.cnoc.lan> <CAN9gPaHjTjxDZ+zhMZ3zR0-jb_Xaeh7VH1EQHRewUaELnPfQGw@mail.gmail.com> <1317397986.24685.82.camel@feddie.cnoc.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1317397986.24685.82.camel@feddie.cnoc.lan>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-09/txt/msg00142.txt.bz2

On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 17:53:06 +0200, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> Well, I've used the virtual-function example for c++ from wikipedia,
> compiled it  (gcc 4.6.1) on Fedora 15 and loaded it into gdb. Stepping
> though gdb it indeed passed gnu-v2-abi.c. So fpc wasn't involved at all.

I do not understand why do you see it:
$ gdb -nx ./animals -ex 'show cp-abi'
The currently selected C++ ABI is "auto" (currently "gnu-v3").

(both FSF GDB and Fedora GDB)


Regards,
Jan