From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1664 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2011 01:59:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 1654 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jul 2011 01:59:47 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 01:59:31 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AF022BB4D4; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 21:59:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id lgK7tt0CCqYO; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 21:59:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7278E2BB4D3; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 21:59:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 92846145615; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 18:59:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 01:59:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Yuri Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb@sourceware.org, Steven Kreuzer Subject: Re: 7.3 is broken on FreeBSD Message-ID: <20110707015927.GY15572@adacore.com> References: <4E14C877.6080402@rawbw.com> <4E14D646.5090003@rawbw.com> <20110706224222.GV15572@adacore.com> <4E14E5D2.1080009@rawbw.com> <20110706225535.GW15572@adacore.com> <4E14EB9C.8080503@rawbw.com> <20110706232418.GX15572@adacore.com> <4E14F266.3030807@rawbw.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E14F266.3030807@rawbw.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00035.txt.bz2 > I see, you meant gdb/config.h, HAVE_PT_GETDBREGS is defined theer: > #define HAVE_PT_GETDBREGS 1 So, we'd be back to square one: Why does GDB crash. Looking at the backtrace, it looks like it tried to make a call via a null function pointer. Since I can't reproduce, and I'm out of ideas of what might be wrong, I'm afraid you'll have to debug this one. -- Joel