From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>, Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Problem with GDB when debugging IRQ handlers
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:29:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110628143014.GD7255@1n450.cable.virginmedia.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110628142045.GC7255@1n450.cable.virginmedia.net>
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 03:20:45PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 04:06:11PM +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> > On 6/28/11, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > I did some checks. It seems, the problem isn't related to unwinder. At least
> > it looks like kernel has all necessary unwinding subops. It looks like the
> > problem is really related to the lack of necessary .cfi information. At least
> > when i added .cfi_startproc/.cfi_endproc annotations to entry-armv.S code,
> > gdb stopped decoding backtrace with the "previous frame identical to this frame"
> > error. Unfortunately I don't have enough knowledge to add .cfi annotations to
> > irq handlers.
>
> I think it may have stopped decoding because of some information it
> reads from the stack doesn't look sane. But I wonder whether we could
> get it looping again depending on the register values in the interrupted
> context.
>
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
> > index e8d8856..d77f9d7 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
> > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
> > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
> > #include "entry-header.S"
> > #include <asm/entry-macro-multi.S>
> >
> > + .cfi_sections .debug_frame
> > /*
> > * Interrupt handling. Preserves r7, r8, r9
> > */
> > @@ -113,6 +114,7 @@ ENDPROC(__und_invalid)
> >
> > .macro svc_entry, stack_hole=0
> > UNWIND(.fnstart )
> > + .cfi_startproc
> > UNWIND(.save {r0 - pc} )
> > sub sp, sp, #(S_FRAME_SIZE + \stack_hole - 4)
>
> Could you add some directives like below in the svc_entry macro (after
> "sub sp...", not sure if it matters) and check whether gdb behaves
> better:
>
> .cfi_def_cfa_offset S_PC
> .cfi_offset 14, -4
Actually since the return address is in S_PC (which maybe gdb assumes it
would be the saved LR), this is probably not be correct. After SVC
entry, we have he following structure on the stack:
ORIG_r0
CPSR
<--- assuming this is the Call Frame Address (SP+S_PC+4)
PC <--- CFA - 4
LR <--- don't care
SP <--- CFA - 12
...
So we tell gdb about this with something like below (untested):
.cfi_def_cfa_offset S_PC + 4
.cfi_offset 14, -4
.cfi_offset 13, -12
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-28 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20110627125306.GA30646@doriath.ww600.siemens.net>
[not found] ` <20110627132735.GE16103@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
2011-06-27 14:04 ` Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
2011-06-27 14:12 ` Hui Zhu
2011-06-27 14:59 ` Yao Qi
2011-06-28 10:40 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-28 12:06 ` Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
2011-06-28 12:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-28 14:19 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-06-28 14:29 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2011-06-28 14:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-28 14:42 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-06-28 14:44 ` Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
2011-06-28 14:58 ` Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
2011-06-28 15:06 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-06-28 15:46 ` Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
2011-06-28 16:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-06-28 22:26 ` Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
2011-06-29 9:10 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-06-29 11:21 ` Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
2011-06-28 12:07 ` Hui Zhu
2011-06-28 12:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-28 13:22 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110628143014.GD7255@1n450.cable.virginmedia.net \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dbaryshkov@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.y.miao@gmail.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=yao@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox