From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26222 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2011 17:00:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 26210 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jun 2011 17:00:39 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:00:24 +0000 Received: (qmail 29543 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2011 17:00:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO scottsdale.localnet) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 15 Jun 2011 17:00:23 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: ARI/Commit rules Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:00:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-8-generic; KDE/4.6.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Joel Brobecker , pmuldoon@redhat.com References: <201106151738.59715.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20110615164743.GQ5944@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20110615164743.GQ5944@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201106151800.21289.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg00110.txt.bz2 On Wednesday 15 June 2011 17:47:43, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > I actually don't know how to get to the repository > > where the script is hosted, and where to get the script > > that is invoking the gdb_ari.sh. I'm guessing its home > > is at the same place the webpages are, and perhaps the logic > > of which files to run the ari script on are only in some > > cron script somewhere? > > It's the 'ss' repository at sourceware.org, but you need to be > part of the gdbadmin group on this machine. > > If there is interest, I think what we should do is move the gdb_ari.sh > script to the gdb repository, and I will adjust the nightly scripts > accordingly. Makes sense to me. It'd be most useful if we brought along most of the logic around the script invocation as well, of course. -- Pedro Alves