From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3410 invoked by alias); 9 Jun 2011 14:51:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 3400 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Jun 2011 14:51:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 14:50:59 +0000 Received: (qmail 11773 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2011 14:50:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO scottsdale.localnet) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 9 Jun 2011 14:50:58 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: Joel Brobecker Subject: Re: ReBranch - a record-replay debugging tool Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 14:51:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-8-generic; KDE/4.6.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: pi3orama@gmail.com, gdb@sourceware.org References: <201106091325.59412.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20110609143651.GP12848@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20110609143651.GP12848@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201106091550.54928.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg00054.txt.bz2 On Thursday 09 June 2011 15:36:51, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > One detail. Files that had been derived from other GPL files > > should not lose the original copyright notice. Of course > > you can _add_ a note on your own copyright. That is, e.g., > > on exception.h|c, I suggest something like: > > > > /* Copyright (C) 1986, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, > > 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, > > 2009, 2010, 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > > > > Copyright (C) 2009, 2010, 2011 Nan Wang > ^^^^^^^^ > > If the files are going to be contributed to the GDB project, > I think we'll want the copyright to say FSF, no? The files in question are heavily modified and repurposed for ReBranch. I was under the impression that the tool wanted to remain a separate project. But if Nan is planning on assigning the copyright to the FSF, yes. Of course, that'd be super cool, as that way we could import bits into gdb/gdbserver proper where it would make sense. (Not that I know which bits would that be.) Nan, let us know if that's the case. -- Pedro Alves