From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14207 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2011 23:48:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 14144 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Mar 2011 23:48:19 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 23:48:17 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2TNm4lj012945 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:48:04 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (ovpn-113-146.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.146]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p2TNm3q4004255 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:48:04 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by greed.delorie.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2TNm2W4008926; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:48:02 -0400 Received: (from dj@localhost) by greed.delorie.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p2TNm1nj008925; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:48:01 -0400 Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 23:48:00 -0000 Message-Id: <201103292348.p2TNm1nj008925@greed.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: fche@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) CC: joseph@codesourcery.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org, newlib@sourceware.org In-reply-to: Subject: Re: On the toplevel configure and build system References: <201103292228.p2TMSAPB006048@greed.delorie.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00187.txt.bz2 > Perhaps if we do move to git for all the /src stuff, we can have a > /toplevel git repository with different branches suitable for each > of your tastes of such policy. Perhaps I misunderstand how this would work (/me hates git) but I'm not looking forward to adding support to umpteen million branches each time I do a base port...