From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-38925-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 11521 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2011 21:16:50 -0000
Received: (qmail 11511 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Mar 2011 21:16:49 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 21:16:43 +0000
Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2TLGg7g027377	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:16:42 -0400
Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1])	by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2TLGduX007137	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);	Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:16:41 -0400
Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2TLGcwS022690;	Tue, 29 Mar 2011 23:16:38 +0200
Received: (from jkratoch@localhost)	by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p2TLGauv022677;	Tue, 29 Mar 2011 23:16:36 +0200
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 21:16:00 -0000
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: Edjunior Barbosa Machado <emachado@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: question, re: gdb.base/label.exp
Message-ID: <20110329211636.GA22645@host1.jankratochvil.net>
References: <4D658D9B.80207@vmware.com> <m37hcph4xc.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4D66A1A8.2010503@vmware.com> <20110224192603.GA22762@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <m3ei6xdwjg.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20110225091943.GA1314@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <4D91EE45.10407@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <m3d3laou3e.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m3d3laou3e.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00179.txt.bz2

On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 16:54:29 +0200, Tom Tromey wrote:
> I changed this code in GDB this past week.  Now GDB looks at the label's
> DW_AT_low_pc, not DW_AT_decl_line.
> 
> I don't know whether there are bugs with this in older versions of GCC.

At least on RHEL-5 gcc-4.1.2-50.el5.x86_64 the testcase has now turned
FAIL->PASS.


Thanks,
Jan