From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20346 invoked by alias); 28 Oct 2010 02:50:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 20336 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Oct 2010 02:50:07 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 02:50:02 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6888D2BACDC for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 22:50:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id CHJ20LVZ-cRR for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 22:50:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4460F2BACD4 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 22:50:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D7729F59A2; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 22:49:58 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 02:50:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: GDB 7.2.1 release? Message-ID: <20101028024958.GB2757@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-10/txt/msg00112.txt.bz2 Hello everyone, It's time to ask ourselves whether we want to make a minor release off of the 7.2 branch. According to the tentative schedule, we were planning on making it around 3 months after the 7.2 release, which would be Dec 2nd. First, I would like to determine which changes we've made that should go in the branch. So far, we have 3 changes, but there are probably more changes that could go in the branch... Please let us know if you are aware of any such change. Thanks! -- Joel PS: I chose 3 months because I try to aim for 2 major releases a year, and having a .1 release after 3 months splits the 6 months period in 2. It's not a strong reason, just a semi-abitrary guideline, and we can either make it earlier or later depending on the issues that we find in the latest release.