From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17349 invoked by alias); 4 Sep 2010 06:26:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 17339 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Sep 2010 06:26:46 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 06:26:40 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o846Qc91028035 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 02:26:38 -0400 Received: from host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o846QaZV012553 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 4 Sep 2010 02:26:38 -0400 Received: from host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o846QaCT022854; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 08:26:36 +0200 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o846QZts022853; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 08:26:35 +0200 Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 06:26:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Tom Tromey Cc: GDB Development Subject: Re: multi-{inferior,exec} Message-ID: <20100904062635.GA22080@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-09/txt/msg00021.txt.bz2 On Sat, 04 Sep 2010 00:40:53 +0200, Tom Tromey wrote: > * gdbserver needs work for multi-inferior + multi-arch > Maybe we need a target description per inferior here. Probably clear but it should be made with plans for the next support for multiple remote hosts. That is GDB connecting to multiple gdbservers. Or as was suggested (Pedro?) to have one gdb <-> multiplexing gdbserver <-> multiple hosts' gdbservers. Unaware target_gdbarch should be gdbserver protocol vs. inferior arch related etc.: [01/03] Update target_gdbarch for current inferior http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-01/msg00228.html Thanks, Jan