Re: support biarch gcore?

H.J. Lu
2010-07-08T04:47:13Z

On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> > Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 22:48:44 +0200 (CEST)
>> > From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
>> >
>> > Unfortunately, it also turned out that the section sizes provided for
>> > .reg in those targets that have gdbarch_core_regset_sections, while
>> > currently unused, were also nearly all wrong ...
>> >
>> > The following patch fixes those sizes, and changes linux-nat.c to
>> > use them.
>
>> Although I don't feel qualified to judge the powerpc bits, this makes
>> quite a bit of sense to me.  And yes, the value for amd64-linux is
>> obviously wrong.
>
> OK, thanks!
>
> I've checked the patch in now.
>

Does this fix

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11467

You can verify it with the testcase in

http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-04/msg00425.html

--
H.J.