From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9303 invoked by alias); 27 May 2010 14:50:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 9270 invoked by uid 22791); 27 May 2010 14:50:11 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 May 2010 14:49:59 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 493A22BAC0D; Thu, 27 May 2010 10:49:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id kErBcLMFYXAx; Thu, 27 May 2010 10:49:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E70A2BAB9F; Thu, 27 May 2010 10:49:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 25111F58FA; Thu, 27 May 2010 07:49:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 14:50:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Phil Muldoon Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: make the GDB 7.2 release sooner? Message-ID: <20100527144944.GH20736@adacore.com> References: <20100527002906.GG20736@adacore.com> <4BFE7AA2.3050708@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BFE7AA2.3050708@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-05/txt/msg00094.txt.bz2 > The final "large" Python API patch was the py-inferior/py-infthread > stuff I submitted earlier this week. I'd really like to see that in > there and ship the next release of GDB as pretty much the API > equivalent (or as close as possible) to the Archer Python branch. > > There are a few other API patches too, but they are minor and address > random bits of functionality. So if we can do this, and ship some of the > neat Python scripts in there too, that would be awesome! I would really like that. -- Joel