From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-37310-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 26733 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2010 19:33:31 -0000
Received: (qmail 26722 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Apr 2010 19:33:30 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 	tests=BAYES_40
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from az33egw02.freescale.net (HELO az33egw02.freescale.net) (192.88.158.103)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 19:33:26 +0000
Received: from az33smr01.freescale.net (az33smr01.freescale.net [10.64.34.199]) 	by az33egw02.freescale.net (8.14.3/az33egw02) with ESMTP id o3NJXO3G003263 	for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 12:33:24 -0700 (MST)
Received: from cortelldt.freescale.com (cortelldt.am.freescale.net [10.82.136.164]) 	by az33smr01.freescale.net (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id o3NJfbWR021914 	for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:41:38 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <201004231941.o3NJfbWR021914@az33smr01.freescale.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 19:33:00 -0000
To: gdb@sourceware.org
From: John Cortell <rat042@freescale.com>
Subject: sending CTRL-C to Cygwin gdb 6.8 has no effect
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00113.txt.bz2

In CDT, we've had to resort to sending a CTRL-C to the inferior 
process of a Cygwin gdb session because gdb itself doesn't react to 
the CTRL-C. Is this a known issue? Is it addressed in HEAD? 
Naturally, that approach isn't an option when debugging a remote program.

John