From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: pieter.maljaars@altenpts.nl
Cc: "Joel Brobecker" <brobecker@adacore.com>,
"Pierre Muller" <pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>,
Peter.Schauer@regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de,
gdb@sourceware.org,
"'Joseph S. Myers'" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: Question about solaris CANNOT_STEP_HW_WATCHPOINTS macro
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:27:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201004231427.19661.pedro@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100423074150.24ae59af@mail.altenpts.nl>
On Friday 23 April 2010 08:41:50, Pieter Maljaars wrote:
> I have tested this with Solaris 2.10 and GDB-7.1. I have removed
> the CANNOT_STEP_HW_WATCHPOINT define. Here this bug does not occur.
>
> (gdb) start
> Temporary breakpoint 1 at 0x8050681: file watchp.c, line 13.
> Starting program: [...]/watchp
>
> Temporary breakpoint 1, main () at watchp.c:13
> 13 myrec.x = 5;
> (gdb) print myrec.x
> $1 = 0
> (gdb) watch myrec.x
> Hardware watchpoint 2: myrec.x
> (gdb) s
> Hardware watchpoint 2: myrec.x
>
> Old value = 0
> New value = 5
> main () at watchp.c:14
> 14 myrec.y = 3.4;
>
>
> Here it works as expected. GDB stops also at the other watchpoint.
> So with "step" and "continue" both watchpoints are triggered, like
> it behaves on x86-linux.
(I assume this was x86 or x86-64 solaris, not sparc.) If you
_don't_ remove the CANNOT_STEP_HW_WATCHPOINT, then I suppose
you'll see watchpoints being missed when you step (since
the workaround works by removing watchpoints
when single-stepping) on Solaris 10 as well.
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-23 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-23 7:42 Pieter Maljaars
2010-04-23 12:42 ` Pierre Muller
2010-04-23 12:59 ` Joel Brobecker
2010-04-23 13:27 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2010-04-23 14:08 ` Joel Brobecker
2010-04-23 16:17 ` Pierre Muller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-04-23 14:05 Pieter Maljaars
2010-04-09 20:07 Pierre Muller
2010-04-22 13:56 ` Joel Brobecker
2010-04-22 15:47 ` Pierre Muller
2010-04-22 16:51 ` Peter Schauer
2010-04-23 0:00 ` Joel Brobecker
2010-04-23 0:56 ` Pedro Alves
2010-04-23 3:36 ` Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201004231427.19661.pedro@codesourcery.com \
--to=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=Peter.Schauer@regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr \
--cc=pieter.maljaars@altenpts.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox