From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27278 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2010 14:08:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 27269 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Apr 2010 14:08:08 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:08:04 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C64E2BAD08; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 10:08:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id iGZgJ3-MgBDt; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 10:08:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13FFE2BACF4; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 10:08:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CECB2F5895; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 07:08:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:08:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: pieter.maljaars@altenpts.nl, Pierre Muller , Peter.Schauer@regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de, gdb@sourceware.org, "'Joseph S. Myers'" Subject: Re: Question about solaris CANNOT_STEP_HW_WATCHPOINTS macro Message-ID: <20100423140802.GN13204@adacore.com> References: <20100423074150.24ae59af@mail.altenpts.nl> <201004231427.19661.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201004231427.19661.pedro@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00102.txt.bz2 > (I assume this was x86 or x86-64 solaris, not sparc.) If you > _don't_ remove the CANNOT_STEP_HW_WATCHPOINT, then I suppose > you'll see watchpoints being missed when you step (since > the workaround works by removing watchpoints > when single-stepping) on Solaris 10 as well. Just for the record, I just finished testing on x86-solaris 10, and same results as on 8... -- Joel