From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24780 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2010 03:36:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 24768 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Apr 2010 03:36:25 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 03:36:17 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8542BAB89; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 23:36:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id NaOM2tEPXX8Z; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 23:36:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C9512BAB3F; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 23:36:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 720F1F5895; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:36:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 03:36:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: Pierre Muller , Peter.Schauer@regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de, gdb@sourceware.org, 'Pieter Maljaars' , "'Joseph S. Myers'" Subject: Re: Question about solaris CANNOT_STEP_HW_WATCHPOINTS macro Message-ID: <20100423033612.GI13204@adacore.com> References: <001501cad820$36771f50$a3655df0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <003101cae232$e2564ff0$a702efd0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <20100422235956.GG13204@adacore.com> <201004230156.03303.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201004230156.03303.pedro@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00090.txt.bz2 > Do we still care for <= 2.7 at this point? (and before someone > spontaneously says "yes"; does GDB still work okay on such old > Solaris systems?) To care and support 2.6 or 2.7, we need a contributor who can run and fix bugs on those platforms. AdaCore unfortunately cannot help since the older version we have is 2.8, and so far, I am under the impression that none of the usual contributors do. We can send an email to gdb-announce if helps making the decision, but at this point, I'm quite comfortable dropping 2.7 and older. -- Joel